In recent developments, the Mumbai High Court has questioned the Maharashtra Government regarding the persistence of this tax. During a hearing, the court sought clarity on the usage of the funds collected under this scheme, which was initially designed to provide relief for farmers and rural areas severely impacted by drought. The court asked for transparency on whether the funds have been effectively allocated for their intended purpose.
The public has expressed dissatisfaction
The public, too, has expressed dissatisfaction, as the tax adds to the already high fuel prices in the state. The average petrol price in Maharashtra is among the highest in the country, and the additional tax burden further strains household budgets and transportation costs. Citizens, especially those in urban areas like Mumbai and Pune, are voicing their concerns over the lack of clarity on how long the tax will continue and how the funds are being utilized.
Opposition parties have criticized the government, accusing it of exploiting the situation under the guise of a drought relief measure. They argue that the prolonged implementation of the tax without proper justification or sunset clauses amounts to unfair taxation.
In response, government officials maintain that the ‘Drought Tax’ remains necessary to ensure the state’s preparedness for natural calamities and to continue the relief efforts in drought-prone areas. However, they have yet to provide detailed financial reports or a timeline for its cessation.
The Mumbai High Court has demanded a comprehensive report from the government, which is expected to be submitted in the coming weeks. As the debate continues, all eyes remain on the government to justify its stance and provide a clear roadmap for the use of the ‘Drought Tax’ funds.